Languaging
(See also other keywords)
Reality-shapers?
- In the 6th century, Bhartrihari (450-510) argued that our ‘reality’ is structured by language.
- By changing a ‘linguistic paradigm’ (c.f. de Saussure, 1916) we change what is ‘thinkable’ (Whorf, 1956).
- So education systems can disempower us by making us conform to dictionary definitions & paradigms.
- However, if we are bold enough to think across the rules we can all play a part in co-creating the world.
- (See Mathilda Tham's video).
- These kinds of conversations might need:
- to assume that participants are equal in (this may not always be possible)
- to contain deep listening
- to be non-confrontational
- to start without an agenda
- to be open to unexpected possibilities
The verb to language
- The American saying: "there ain't a noun that can't be verbed" is seldom heard in the UK.
- This is because the English traditionally use the word 'language' only as a noun.
- This limits it to playing an exclusively passive role within the communication process.
- It means we need other verbs (e.g. 'to learn', or 'to speak') to make it work actively.
- But both of these examples are only subsets of what we mean by 'languaging'.
How do babies learn to speak?
- It is clear that babies do not 'learn' to speak by memorising vocabularies and rules.
- Instead, they use a profoundly heuristic approach to discover what 'works' for them.
- It is a highly situated learning process that can create new, but meaningful syntax.
- At the social level, it integrates what the infant 'wants' with what others 'want'.
- In this sense infants 'co-language' their survival within an adult-led world.
- This opportunistic 'languaging' activity is not unique to babies - we can all do it.
- Who invents new words that appear in the language, quite frequently? (We all do).
Language informs what we notice
- Sometimes, an unexpected event may go unnoticed - until someone gives it a suitable name.
- We can re-attune ourselves to a new 'reality' by finding a new metaphor/syntax (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980).
- This would be a way to change attitudes, relationships and habits of behaviour.
- Powerful organisations may commission media consultants to promote a particular belief.
EXAMPLE:
George Monbiot 1/11/2018 published this on Twitter:
CURRENT TERM | SUGGESTED REVISION | RATIONALE |
The environment | The living planet / natural world | |
Climate change | Climate breakdown | |
Global warming | Global heating | |
Biodiversity | Wildlife | |
Fish stocks | Fish populations | (don't exist to be exploited) |
Natural resources | Living systems / the fabric of the Earth | (don't exist to be exploited) |
Natural capital | Nature / living systems | |
Ecosystem services | Life support systems | |
Nature reserves | Wildlife refuges | (‘reserve’ implies distance) |
Extinction | Ecocide / annihilation | (these terms suggest agency) |
The planet | The living planet | |
Saving the planet | Defending the living planet | |
Climate sceptic | Climate science denier | |
Freemarket think tank | Opaquely-funded lobby group |
Verbing the world
- The popularity of Object-Oriented Ontologies has inspired the Internet of Things
- But this may have eclipsed the importance of a Relations Oriented Ontology.
See
1. http://newschoolfutures.com/Jeong-glossary
2. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03190-y
(Object:Relations ratios are always low)