Autopoiesis
(see also allopoiesis, apoptosis, sympoiesis, Bildung and other key terms)
Staying Alive
- How do living organisms maintain the conditions that ensure their continuing survival?
- In the 1970s, biologists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela described the self-organizing capacity of living systems as autopoiesis (from Greek):
- ‘Auto’ means ‘self’
- ‘Poiesis’ means ‘production’ or ‘creation.’
- Loosely speaking, the theory says that the only way a living system dies is when it fails to reconcile its interior and exterior identities.
- This implies that an organisation's interior and exterior worlds are distinct.
- Of course, this is a limit case, as inside and outside interconnect via a semi-permeable boundary.
A systemic theory
- Maturana & Varela described ‘autopoiesis' as a state of internal unity that is maintained by processes that include self-realization.
- This derives from a network of processes of production (transformation and destruction) of components that produces the components which:
- 1) through their interactions and transformations continuously regenerate and realize the network of processes (relations) that produced them
- 2) constitute it (the machine) as a concrete unity in the space in which they (the components) exist by specifying the topological domain of its realization as such a network (Maturana & Varela, 1973: 78-9)
Abstracted from biology
- This schematic diagram is simple enough to allow the comparison of very different entities.
Relevance for learners
how Bert sees
how others
himself
see Bert
- Maturana and Varela’s theory puts great store by the way that organisms manage the relationships between their interior-identity and their perceived identity within a given context.
- Here, the idea of ‘self-identity’ is important at an existential level, irrespective of species, location or status.
Maintaining one's identity
how Bert saw
how the lion
himself
saw Bert
- Autopoiesis works when organisms manage the relationship between their self-identity and their image, as conveyed back to them by the environment (e.g. other organisms and conditions that impinge on their world).
Relevance for healers
- This theory is also useful for medical practitioners and designer/managers of brand identities.
- It claims that survival always depends on self-adaptation to new conditions and/or changing one's identity.
- Humans are social animals and suffer, or even die, when isolated by exclusion (see apoptosis)
- Whether the ‘living system’ is a small biological organism or a large corporation is immaterial.
- Maturana and Varela theory implies that the only cause of an organism's 'death' is an insufficient match (i.e. operationally) between its internal and its external identity.
- Habits of language and culture will affect how people interpret the term ‘identity’.
Further reading
- Maturana, H. R. (1997), Metadesign, accessed from Instituto de Terapia Cognitiva INTECO, Providencia 2608 of. 62, Santiago, CHILE.
- Maturana, H. & Varela, F.,(1992). The Tree of Knowledge; biological roots of understanding. Boston: Shambala.
- Maturana, H. & Varela, F. (1980). “Autopoiesis and Cognition; the realisation of the Living.” In Boston Studies in Philosophy of Science. Boston: Reidel.
- Varela, F., Maturana, H. & Uribe, R. (1974) "Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model". Biosystems 5, pp. 187–196.
- See Biesecker, A., (1998), Economic Rationales and a Wealth of Time, in pursuit of a new economy of time