Team consciousness
(return to Co-creative Learning Teams, an article on Languaging-Co-creation or see more keywords)
The Whole Course
- Systems Thinking
- Self-regulation
- Self-coordination
- Living systems
- Team consciousness
- Team synergy
- Team sizes
- Team diversity
- Lucky Teams
- Team Evaluation
Consciousness
- If our teamwork is to work as a living system then it should be fully conscious.
- Unfortunately, discussions about consciousness can quickly get deeply philosophical.
- But a tech pioneer claimed that humans are far less conscious than computers (Minsky, 1988).
- He was referring to the programming language LISP which constantly checks all its functions.
- His idea may not satisfy philosophers but it is a useful basis for discussing teamwork.
- Rather than thinking about individual consciousness we might envisage team consciousness,
Team Consciousness
- We might call Minsky's concept team consciousness.
- While it is a mechanistic idea it could be a useful model for teambuilders.
- We can analyse team consciousness using some key parameters:
| # | CRITERION | FATAL? | OPTIMAL: | FATAL?
|
| 1). | Size of the organisation | too big | optimal | too small
|
| 2). | Diversity of member types | too diverse | optimal | too similar
|
| 3). | Connectedness between members | too isolated | optimal | too enmeshed
|
| 4). | Proportion of the team who message | too low | optimal | too high
|
| 5). | Frequency of messaging | too frequent | optimal | too infrequent
|
| 6). | Warmth of messaging | too distracting | optimal | too impersonal
|
| 7). | Delays between messages | too long | optimal | scarily short |
- Although this is hypothetical some measures might be useful.
- (see more detail)
Levels of Team Consciousness
- Suppose a perfect team is 100% conscious of its interior AND exterior environment.
- This would give us a basis for measuring its potential for working well.
- Here is a hypothetical set of conditions by which to evaluate a real team.
| * | CATEGORY | AWARENESS OF EXTERIOR STATE | INTERNAL CONNECTEDNESS
|
| 1. | Shamanic Consciousness | 100% aware of surroundings | 100% information sharing internally
|
| 2. | Functionally Semi-conscious | Aware of its predicament | Low awareness of its situation
|
| 3. | Zombie Organisation | Oblivious to new circumstances | Functions by habitual actions
|
| 4. | Comatose/Vegetative State | Unaware of its predicament | Functionally unaware of itself |
Team Hierarchies
- Suitably managed - a large team can deliver creative output.
- However, our first priority is the support of participants, not outsiders.
- Managerial hierarchies inevitably reduce team consciousness
- e.g. vertical organisations create an ‘iceberg of ignorance’ (Yoshida, 1989)
- This means that information is shared unevenly throughout the system.
- Participative, action-based learning is more memorable than theory-based learning.
- Creative learning is therefore more likely from small teams, rather than large ones.
- ⇒ go to NEXT SESSION or return to The School of Co-creation